💡 AkunIndo Pricing Tool

Pricing Model Options

Model 1: Freemium with Receipt Limits

Strategy: Classic SaaS model - free tier attracts users, premium features drive revenue. Free users get limited OCR processing (10 receipts/month), paid users get full features and higher limits.

Business Analysis Insights: Target 10% free-to-paid conversion with 70% free users, 20% starter, 8% professional, 2% business distribution. Break-even at ~5,000 total users (500 paid). Sustainable margins of 60-77% once operational costs are optimized.

Percentage of free users who upgrade
50 receipts/month, basic features
200 receipts/month, all features
Unlimited receipts, priority support

Target Market: Growing SMEs who need predictable monthly costs and want to scale their usage over time.

Pros: Predictable revenue, easy upselling, familiar model

Cons: High customer acquisition cost, churn risk, free user infrastructure costs

Model 2: Pay-Per-Receipt Bundles

Strategy: Prepaid credit system like mobile phone plans. Users buy "receipt packs" that don't expire quickly, aligning cost with actual usage. Better for irregular usage patterns.

Business Analysis Insights: No monthly commitment reduces barrier for SMEs. Prepaid model improves cash flow with 70-80% margins. Average 2.5 packs/year per user = $4.30/user/year. Break-even at ~3,000 active users with better cost control.

Percentage who purchase bundles
30 receipts, 3mo validity
100 receipts, 6mo validity
250 receipts, 12mo validity

Target Market: SMEs with seasonal or irregular receipt volumes who prefer to pay only when they need the service.

Pros: Low commitment barrier, better cash flow, cost aligns with value

Cons: Variable monthly revenue, complex pricing communication, potential revenue volatility

Model 3: Ecosystem Partnership

Strategy: Core app is free or very cheap, revenue comes from partnerships with accounting software (Jurnal.id, Zoho), financial services (business loans, insurance), and educational content. Think "freemium app + referral marketplace".

Business Analysis Insights: Diversified revenue reduces subscription dependency. Target $2.80/month ARPU from multiple streams. Break-even at ~2,000 users. Revenue includes: software partnerships ($0.50/user/mo), financial referrals ($20-50 per loan), educational content (30% commission), payment processing (0.1% volume).

Users paying for premium features
Unlimited OCR, advanced exports
Revenue share from integrations
Financial services referrals

Partnership Examples: Export to Jurnal.id (revenue share), refer business loans (commission), sell accounting courses (affiliate fee), integrate with payment processors (transaction fees).

Target Market: Maximum user base with diversified revenue streams, especially effective if we can build strong partnership network.

Pros: Diversified revenue, low user barrier, value-added services, sustainable competitive moat

Cons: Complex partnerships to negotiate, longer time to establish, revenue dependency on partners

Cost Structure Analysis

Infrastructure Costs per User Type

User Type Receipts/Month Database OCR Storage Total Infra
Light $0.05 $0.01 $0.01 $0.09
Average $0.15 $0.05 $0.05 $0.27
Heavy $0.50 $0.20 $0.20 $0.92

Operational Costs

$/user/month
$/user/month (amortized)
$/user/month

Break-Even Analysis

Minimum revenue needed: $1.27/user/month

Target margin: 70% (industry standard for SaaS)

Recommended ARPU: $4.23/month

Parameter Configuration

User Distribution

Model Comparison & Recommendations

Strategic Recommendations